यूएफसी 264 के लिए सट्टेबाजी की बाधाओं: डस्टिन पोयरियर बनाम यूएफसी 264 इस शनिवार को नीचे चला जाता है, और प्रचार हर दिन निर्माण जारी रहता है। जब भी इस परिमाण की एक खेल घटना होती है, तो एक चीज निरंतर बनी हुई है ... पेशेवर खेल की शुरुआत के बाद से, दुनिया भर के लोग जुआ द्वारा पैसे कमाने का प्रयास करेंगे, जो उन्हें लगता है कि जीतेंगे। तेरह दिलचस्प मैचअप के साथ और बहुत सारे प्रोप दांव उपलब्ध हैं, यूएफसी 264 कुछ पैसे जीतने के लिए उत्कृष्ट एमएमए कार्यक्रम है। उन लोगों के लिए जो जुआ के लिए नए हैं, सट्टेबाजी बाधाओं को समझना पहले बेहद भ्रमित हो सकता है। आइए उदाहरण के रूप में मुख्य कार्यक्रम का उपयोग करें। डस्टिन पोयरियर एक -125 सट्टेबाजी पसंदीदा है, जिसका अर्थ है कि इसमें $ 100 जीतने के लिए $ 125 लगेंगे। आपको $ 125 वापस मिल जाएगा, इसलिए आप कुल 225 डॉलर के साथ चले जाते हैं। 105 अंडरडॉग, जिसका अर्थ है कि यदि आप उस पर $ 100 शर्त लगाते हैं, तो आप $ 105 जीतेंगे। आपको अपना $ 100 वापस मिल जाएगा, इसलिए आप कुल $ 205 के साथ चलते हैं। यूएफसी 264 में लड़ाई कार्ड भर में सट्टेबाजी लाइनों की एक किस्म है। 530)। निकटतम सट्टेबाजी रेखा ड्रिकस डु प्लेसिस (-115) और ट्रेविन गिल्स (-105) के बीच एक मिडिलवेट बाउट से आती है। आप इस बारे में विशिष्ट प्रोप दांव भी पा सकते हैं कि आप कैसे सोचते हैं कि लड़ाई खत्म हो जाएगी और क्या दौर के दौरान। सभी चीजों पर विचार किया गया, यूएफसी 264 में एक अप्रत्याशित घटना होने की क्षमता है, इसलिए अपने जोखिम पर शर्त लगाएं। सट्टेबाजी बाधाएं Wynnbet की सौजन्य हैं। नीचे सूचीबद्ध बाधाएं इस लेख को लिखे गए समय पर रेखाओं को प्रतिबिंबित करती हैं और परिवर्तन के अधीन हैं। यूएफसी 264: डस्टिन पोयरियर बनाम मुख्य कार्ड (10 बजे डस्टिन पोयरियर (-125) बनाम। ताई तुिवासा (-135) बनाम इरेन एल्डाना (-120) बनाम शॉन ओ'मालेली (-750) बनाम प्रारंभिक कार्ड (8) पीएम मैक्स ग्रिफिन (-185) बनाम ड्रिकस डु प्लेसिस (-115) बनाम प्रारंभिक प्रारंभिक कार्ड (6 बजे जेनिफर माया (-195) बनाम झलगास झूमगुलोव (-360) बनाम एलन अमेदोवस्की (-140) बनाम यूएफसी 264 शनिवार, 10 जुलाई, 2021 को, लास वेगास, नेवादा में टी-मोबाइल एरिना से रहते हैं। अपने सभी लाइव समाचार और हाइलाइट्स के लिए प्रशंसकों के साथ पालन करें।  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
The first and perhaps easiest question facing the industry is how quickly and how widely will sports gambling be adopted by states? Religious concerns have not stopped Mississippi from legalizing sports gambling, however. गैरेट और मार्श (2002) द्वारा बताया गया है, राज्यों में एक बार, सरकारी लॉटरी वैध करने के लिए शुरू पड़ोसी राज्यों ने अपने राज्य की खेल या सीमा पार टिकट खरीदने की लॉटरी खिलाड़ियों के लिए अन्यथा खो उपभोक्ता खर्च को वैध करने के लिए दबाव महसूस करने के लिए शुरू कर दिया। 2020 तक, इस दबाव लॉटरी को अपनाने के लिए सभी लेकिन 6 राज्यों का नेतृत्व किया था के बाद पहले राज्य लॉटरी 1964 holdouts के बीच में न्यू हैम्पशायर में पुनः स्थापित किया गया था, अलास्का और हवाई सीमा पार से खरीदारी करने से भौगोलिक दृष्टि से संरक्षित हैं, नेवादा के शक्तिशाली जुआ उद्योग सफलतापूर्वक रोक दिया गया है the adoption of a state-sponsored competitor, and conservative religious cultures in Alabama, Mississippi, and Utah have stopped lotteries there. With respect to sports gambling, New Jersey and Delaware legalized the activity immediately upon the Court’s decision in 2018, and many states followed suit. By the end of 2020, 20 states and the District of Columbia had legalized sports gambling, 6 had legalized sports gambling but were pending launch, and over 20 more states were considering legislation (Rodenberg 2020). It appears that sports gambling will soon be legal nearly nationwide. The next big question facing the industry is assessing the potential size of the sports betting market. While these figures may seem high, they pale in comparison to gambling figures in the UK where sports betting has been legal (although highly regulated) since 1960 and is widely available through over 8300 (as of March 2019) small, commercial betting shops spread throughout the country as well as through online betting sites. In the most recent fiscal year prior to shutdowns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person betting shops in the UK generated $3.7 billion and online gambling generated another $2.8 billion in net gambling revenues (UK Gambling Commission 2020). इसका मतलब है कि ब्रिटेन bettors या 2019 में दांव में मोटे तौर पर 130 बिलियन $ रखा देश में $ 2000 प्रति व्यक्ति के बारे में। If industry were to achieve a similar level of popularity in the US market, this would suggest over $600 billion in annual wagers and $32 billion in net sport gambling revenue. खेल जुआ मौजूदा कैसीनो पर व्यक्तिगत रूप से सट्टेबाजी के लिए प्रतिबंधित है, तो राष्ट्रव्यापी वैधीकरण के प्रभाव की संभावना काफी मामूली है। Extrapolating Nevada’s sport wagering data to the national casino market suggests that nationwide legalization might lead to as much as $20 billion in annual wagers and just under $1 billion in net casino revenues. The first paper in this symposium examines this topic by analyzing the determinants of sport gambling handle. Of course, even if the problem of cannibalization is avoided by sports gambling attracting a new customer base, this is not without its own set of problems as sports wagering may introduce an entirely new population to the problems associated with pathological gambling and problem gaming (McGowan 2014). इस तरह के राजस्व आंकड़े संभावना केवल भीतर-खेल व्यक्ति नाटकों के रूप में खेल के परिणामों पर पूरी तरह wagering के लिए विरोध पर दांव लगा और साथ ही जुआ वैध मोबाइल खेल के व्यापक गोद लेने के साथ संभव हो जाएगा। Obviously, another major question facing the industry is the extent to which expanded access to sports gambling will bring in new players to the gambling industry overall or whether it will simply cannibalize existing gambling options such as state lotteries, horse racing, or casino gaming. Slightly less than the $42 billion in net casino gaming revenue generated across the USA. The $32 billion figure would be roughly twice the net gambling revenue generated by state lotteries across the country. The second paper in this symposium examines health outcomes in Canada related to participation in gambling activities (Humphreys et al. Here it seems clear that sports gambling will follow the pattern seen in lottery and casino adoption, although almost certainly at a much faster pace. The sports leagues themselves may also be either winners or losers. वैध खेल जुआ विजेताओं और हारे के बारे में लाने के लिए निश्चित है। As noted above, depending on the level of cannibalization, other forms of gambling are likely to be losers such as horse racing, which is likely to continue its long-term decline in gambling handle (Nash 2009), and potentially casino gaming as identified by Humphreys (2021) इस संगोष्ठी में।On the other hand, sports book operators and mobile application developers are likely winners, so casinos themselves may either be either winners or losers in sports gambling legalization. Brad Humphreys, John Nyman, and Jane Ruseski show that recreational gambling has either no effect or even actually reduces the probability of having certain chronic health conditions and has a positive impact on life satisfaction suggesting the possibility that expanded sport gambling in the USA may not be associated with significant adverse health outcomes. Historically in the USA, https://fairworld.in/ leagues strongly opposed legal sports betting due to the potential for corruption. हाल ही में, तथापि, लीग सट्टेबाजी के खेल की अधिक सहायक बन गए हैं। In part, leagues acknowledge that legal betting markets make it easier for regulators to uncover suspicious betting behavior that could suggest corruption. In many states, the companies FanDuel and DraftKings, who prior to sports gambling legalization operated online fantasy football competitions of controversial legality, have already been able to leverage their fan bases in the online fantasy sports gaming communities into more traditional online sports gambling opportunities. More importantly, teams and leagues have also slowly recognized the potential for higher fan interest if fans have the opportunity to gamble on games. 2013) developed evidence of a significant correlation between betting. There is no doubt that the NCAA can attribute a significant portion of its 23-year, $19.6 billion television contract for March Madness on the popularity of "bracket pools," and likewise the NFL understands the degree to which the explosion of fantasy football leagues has अपने खेल की लोकप्रियता में वृद्धि हुई। Humphreys et al. It is interesting to note that established casinos have not been the only players to enter the online sports gambling market. Television viewership for regular season men’s NCAA basketball games. इसके अलावा, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका में पिछले कई दशकों से अधिक पेशेवर खिलाड़ी वेतन में नाटकीय वृद्धि भ्रष्टाचार की चिंताएं कम हो गया है। It is highly unlikely that star players in any major US league would jeopardize their massive earning potential as an athlete by accepting a bribe to alter a game outcome. Those sports that remain at more significant risk to corruption are those with a high level of fan interest but low player salaries. This describes the working conditions of athletes prior to free-agency in the USA such as during the 1919 Black Sox scandal, referees like Tim Donaghy, and players in minor leagues or small national leagues as well as cricket players prior to the relatively recent formation of the Indian Premier League. (2013) developed evidence of a significant correlation between betting. It also describes the conditions of college athletes in the USA as the NCAA has successfully operated a cartel restricting the ability of even top college players from earning money as a player despite playing for teams generating millions or tens of millions of dollars annually for their host institutions. Television viewership for regular season men’s NCAA basketball games. Finally, legalized sports gambling will provide researchers with troves of new data to analyze one of the oldest questions in gambling economics: are sports betting markets efficient? The third paper in the symposium (Depken and Gandar 2021) explores the topic of integrity fees, payments by sports books to leagues, supposedly to pay for monitoring to ensure against match fixing. Craig Depken and John Gandar find evidence that integrity fees might influence sports books to establish lines that would minimize the chances for payouts in certain game situations. Thus, it comes as no surprise that the NCAA remains adamantly opposed to sport gambling in contrast to the major professional leagues in the USA. Rhett Brymer, रयान एम Rodenberg, Huimiao झेंग, और टिम आर Holcomb जांच कॉलेज फुटबॉल के प्रमुख सम्मेलनों में रेफरी विशेष पूर्वाग्रहों है दिखाया जा सकता है और अगर इन पूर्वाग्रहों उचित रूप से जुआ बाजारों में के लिए जिम्मेदार रहे हैं। Studies like these will remain a fertile area for continued economic research. As guest editor, I wish to thank Eastern Economic Journal co-editors Cynthia Bansak and Allan Zebedee, participants in the sports economics sessions at the 39th annual Eastern Economic Association Conference in New York City, February 2019, and numerous anonymous referees for their assistance in putting together this symposium. The final paper in this symposium provides an excellent example of this type of research (Brymer et al. Sports leagues are naturally eager to take steps to protect themselves against potential corruption in the wake of expanded gambling opportunities. सबसे महत्वपूर्ण बात, धन्यवाद जो दोनों इस संगोष्ठी का प्रस्ताव दिया और एकत्र कर उनकी समीक्षा भाग लेने वाले कागजात पूर्वी आर्थिक एसोसिएशन उपाध्यक्ष ब्रैड Humphreys करने के लिए बाहर जाना। His name should really be on this guest editor’s introduction, but I guess he will have to settle to being co-author on two fine contributions within this symposium.